Smigel v. Meyer London Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smigel v. Meyer London Corp.

262 A.D. 829, 28 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6079

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1941·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with an opportunity to respondents to purge themselves if, within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, a meeting is held and six individuals named by plaintiffs are elected. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with an opportunity to respondents to purge themselves if, within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, a meeting is held and six individuals named by plaintiffs are elected. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Smigel v. Meyer London Corp., 262 A.D. 829, 28 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 829 (Smigel v. Meyer London Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.