Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 28, 2011

Docket2011-3018

StatusUnpublished

This text of Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit JANICE R. SMETS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Resp0nden,t, and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Intervenor. 2011-3018 Petiti0n for review of the Merit Systerns Protection B0ard in case n0. SF1221090607-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motions to reform the offi- cial caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board as the respondent and to permit the Depart1nent of the Navy to intervene, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

SMETS V. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above (2) The Department of the Navy and the Board should calculate their brief due dates from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 2 8 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: Janice R. S1nets K. E1izabeth Witwer, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger Esq. u 8 FlLED ’ . .C0 rHz‘é§`B€§i‘F¢TE?;tS»F°“ JAN 2 8 2011 s20 .lAN HGi?BAI.¥ CLEHK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit JANICE R. SMETS, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Resp0nden,t, and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Intervenor. 2011-3018 Petiti0n for review of the Merit Systerns Protection B0ard in case n0. SF1221090607-W-1. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motions to reform the offi- cial caption to designate the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board as the respondent and to permit the Depart1nent of the Navy to intervene, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

SMETS V. MSPB 2 (1) The motions are granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above (2) The Department of the Navy and the Board should calculate their brief due dates from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 2 8 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: Janice R. S1nets K. E1izabeth Witwer, Esq. Jeffrey Gauger Esq. u 8 FlLED ’ . .C0 rHz‘é§`B€§i‘F¢TE?;tS»F°“ JAN 2 8 2011 s20 .lAN HGi?BAI.¥ CLEHK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Smets v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smets-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.