Smeltz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smeltz v. State

396 So. 2d 811, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19184

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 8, 1981

DocketNo. 80-806

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 396 So. 2d 811 (Smeltz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smeltz v. State, 396 So. 2d 811, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him to two years imprisonment. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief, requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On October 21, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed.

The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The order of the trial court is modified by deleting any reference to appellant’s failure to pay the costs of supervision. Van Johnson v. State, 375 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See Depson v. State, 363 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The order is otherwise affirmed and the motion of the Public Defender to withdraw granted.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probation and sentencing him to two years imprisonment. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief, requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On October 21, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed.

The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The order of the trial court is modified by deleting any reference to appellant’s failure to pay the costs of supervision. Van Johnson v. State, 375 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). See Depson v. State, 363 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The order is otherwise affirmed and the motion of the Public Defender to withdraw granted.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 So. 2d 811, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smeltz-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack