Smelser v. Drane
19 Ala. 245
Opinion
Drane, who was plaintiff below, claimed the land for which he brought this suit, as purchaser at a sale under execution. The Circuit Court allowed the execution to be proved by one of the witnesses of the plaintiffs below, although its loss or destruction was not proved, nor its absence accounted for, nor was any transcript of the record embracing the execution offered. This, we think, ivas erroneous.
Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smelser v. Drane, 19 Ala. 245 (Ala. 1851).
19 Ala. 245 (Smelser v. Drane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ayers v. Roper
111 Ala. 651 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)