Smedes v. Ilsley
68 Miss. 590
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Upon the facts stated in the bill and the amendment proposed, the appellant could not successfully defend an action upon the note itself, if it appeared that the appellees became owners of it as conclusively adjudicated in their favor by the judgment recovered in New York. If theirs, they may maintain an action for whomsoever they please, and the averment of the bill on that subject constitutes no ground for injunction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smedes v. Ilsley, 68 Miss. 590 (Mich. 1891).
68 Miss. 590 (Smedes v. Ilsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Global Oceanic Enterprises, Inc. v. Hynum
857 So. 2d 659 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Global Oceanic Enterprises, Inc. v. Wayne Hynum
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002
Reeves Royalty Co. v. ANB Pump Truck Service
513 So. 2d 595 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1987)
Dibert v. Durham
77 So. 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Thornton v. City of Natchez
41 So. 498 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)