Smedes v. Ilsley

68 Miss. 590
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 68 Miss. 590 (Smedes v. Ilsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smedes v. Ilsley, 68 Miss. 590 (Mich. 1891).

Opinion

Campbell, C. L,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon the facts stated in the bill and the amendment proposed, the appellant could not successfully defend an action upon the note itself, if it appeared that the appellees became owners of it as conclusively adjudicated in their favor by the judgment recovered in New York. If theirs, they may maintain an action for whomsoever they please, and the averment of the bill on that subject constitutes no ground for injunction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Global Oceanic Enterprises, Inc. v. Hynum
857 So. 2d 659 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2003)
Reeves Royalty Co. v. ANB Pump Truck Service
513 So. 2d 595 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1987)
Dibert v. Durham
77 So. 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Thornton v. City of Natchez
41 So. 498 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Miss. 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smedes-v-ilsley-miss-1891.