Smaw v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smaw v. State

163 S.E. 236, 44 Ga. App. 777, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 499

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket21977

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 236 (Smaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smaw v. State, 163 S.E. 236, 44 Ga. App. 777, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Mrs. J, T. Smaw was convicted under an accusation in two counts charging her with (1) maintaining a lewd house, and (2) keeping a “common, ill-governed, and disorderly house.” In the light of the evidence in the petition for certiorari, and especially in consideration of the evidence in the untraversed answer to the certiorari, this court can not say that the general verdict of guilty was not warranted.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Mrs. J, T. Smaw was convicted under an accusation in two counts charging her with (1) maintaining a lewd house, and (2) keeping a “common, ill-governed, and disorderly house.” In the light of the evidence in the petition for certiorari, and especially in consideration of the evidence in the untraversed answer to the certiorari, this court can not say that the general verdict of guilty was not warranted.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 236, 44 Ga. App. 777, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smaw-v-state-gactapp-1932.