Smathers v. Fairbanks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Smathers v. Fairbanks

73 P.2d 1092, 146 Kan. 841, 1937 Kan. LEXIS 65

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 11, 1937

DocketNo. 33,521

StatusPublished

This text of 73 P.2d 1092 (Smathers v. Fairbanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smathers v. Fairbanks, 73 P.2d 1092, 146 Kan. 841, 1937 Kan. LEXIS 65 (kan 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff sued to enforce his landlord’s lien upon the crops grown by the tenant in the sum of $130.18. The lien was enforced in the sum of $56.69. The only controversy between the parties now is whether the lien should have been for the full amount claimed. This involves only $73.49, the difference between the two items. A similar computation shows the amount in controversy as to other appellants to be less than $100. The amount involved is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal.

(G. S. 1935, 60-3303; Townsite Co. v. Zimmerman, 99 Kan. 661, 163 Pac. 452; Harper v. School District, 120 Kan. 52, 242 Pac. 128; Kastner v. Security Savings and Loan Ass’n, 123 Kan. 632, 256 Pac. 989; Knight Soda Fountain Co. v. Conine, 141 Kan. 615, 42 P. 2d 567.)

Therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff sued to enforce his landlord’s lien upon the crops grown by the tenant in the sum of $130.18. The lien was enforced in the sum of $56.69. The only controversy between the parties now is whether the lien should have been for the full amount claimed. This involves only $73.49, the difference between the two items. A similar computation shows the amount in controversy as to other appellants to be less than $100. The amount involved is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal.

(G. S. 1935, 60-3303; Townsite Co. v. Zimmerman, 99 Kan. 661, 163 Pac. 452; Harper v. School District, 120 Kan. 52, 242 Pac. 128; Kastner v. Security Savings and Loan Ass’n, 123 Kan. 632, 256 Pac. 989; Knight Soda Fountain Co. v. Conine, 141 Kan. 615, 42 P. 2d 567.)

Therefore the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 P.2d 1092, 146 Kan. 841, 1937 Kan. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smathers-v-fairbanks-kan-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack