Smartix International Corp. v. MasterCard International LLC

90 A.D.3d 469, 934 N.Y.2d 382

This text of 90 A.D.3d 469 (Smartix International Corp. v. MasterCard International LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smartix International Corp. v. MasterCard International LLC, 90 A.D.3d 469, 934 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

This action for misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential information, fraud, conversion, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty arises from a contract between plaintiff [470]*470and defendant MasterCard International, Inc. pursuant to which plaintiff agreed to develop and deliver “SmartFan,” a software program that allows season-ticket holders for sporting events to manage, trade, or re-sell unused tickets to subscribers who participate in a program implemented through a team-affiliated credit card, and license it for MasterCard’s exclusive use. Plaintiff alleges that after the termination of the contract, MasterCard improperly used SmartFan’s technology to create the Extra Points Affinity Cards (Extra Points) program, a rewards program conceived and developed by defendant MBNA America Bank, N.A., in order to promote NFL team branded payment cards.

MasterCard made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the Extra Points program was not based on SmartFan. Plaintiffs assertion that Extra Points is an improper continuation of SmartFan, based on speculation and hearsay, is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Plaintiffs mere hope that discovery will uncover evidence needed to defeat summary judgment is insufficient to deny the motion (Fulton v Allstate Ins. Co., 14 AD3d 380, 381 [2005]).

Denial of sanctions was not improper since plaintiffs position was not so egregious as to constitute frivolous conduct within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (Parametric Capital Mgt., LLC v Lacker, 26 AD3d 175 [2006]).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P, Saxe, Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fulton v. Allstate Insurance
14 A.D.3d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Parametric Capital Management, LLC v. Lacher
26 A.D.3d 175 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 469, 934 N.Y.2d 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smartix-international-corp-v-mastercard-international-llc-nyappdiv-2011.