SmarterSwipe, Inc. v. Navarrete

Opinion

SmarterSwipe, Inc., 2:24-cv-00299-CDS-MDC Plaintiff(s), ORDER STRIKING RESPONSE (ECF No. VS. 60) Carlos Navarrete, Defendant(s). Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Smarterwipe, Inc.’s Opposition (ECF No. 60) to defendants/counterclaimants’ Motion to Transfer Venue was filed in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2; Local Rule (“LR”) IA 10-5; and the requirements of Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) because it contains redacted information without complying with such authorities. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Smarterwipe, Inc.’s Opposition (ECF No. is STRUCK. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Smarterwipe, Inc. shall file any response/opposition to defendants/counterclaimants’ Motion to Transfer Venue (ECF No. 56) in compliance with the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 and LR IA 10-5, and the requirements of Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), by no later than October 11, 2024. DATED this 7" day of October 2024. fie] IT IS SO ORDERED. fF f ‘\ fff | 4 H6n. Maximilfano Df Couvillier III United States (Magystrate Judge