Smart v. State

32 S.W.2d 197, 116 Tex. Crim. 639, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 841
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1930·No. No. 13600.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft, a felony; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The caption fails to show the date of. the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court the appeal must be dismissed. Cousineau v. State, 10 S. W. (2d) 98.

The recognizance for the appeal is fatally defective. It is in the form of an ordinary appearance bond. It fails to state that *640 appellant was convicted of a felony, and nowhere therein is appellant bound to abide the “Judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.” Art. 817, C. C. P.; Lynch v. State, 279 S. W. 271. Appellant being enlarged on a fatally defective recognizance, this court is without jurisdiction. Read v. State, 4 S. W. (2d) 547.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smart v. State, 32 S.W.2d 197, 116 Tex. Crim. 639, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 841 (Tex. 1930).

32 S.W.2d 197 (Smart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Eckles
441 P.2d 36 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
Toms v. Hartford Fire Insurance
61 N.E.2d 98 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1945)
Wood v. State
125 S.W.2d 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Putty v. State
70 S.W.2d 732 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Griffin v. State
51 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Moore v. State
51 S.W.2d 583 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)