Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Smart v. State

Smart v. State

27 S.W.2d 813, 115 Tex. Crim. 147, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 384
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 1930
DocketNo. 13160.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 S.W.2d 813 (Smart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smart v. State, 27 S.W.2d 813, 115 Tex. Crim. 147, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 384 (Tex. 1930).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

There are no questions of law presented for review save the sufficiency of the evidence. A recital of the evidence is deemed unnecessary. The burglary was proved by the owner of the premises, and a part of the stolen property was found in the possession of the appellant. An accomplice testified, detailing the entire transaction and connecting the appellant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is adequate to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. State
463 S.W.2d 733 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Tubbs v. State
60 S.W.2d 220 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Comeaux v. State
42 S.W.2d 255 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.W.2d 813, 115 Tex. Crim. 147, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smart-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.