Smart v. State
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a successive petition for post-conviction relief filed under Criminal Procedure Rule 3.850, 33 F.S.A. The ground for relief asserted in the instant petition or motion was considered in an earlier petition or motion and rejected by the court. In Smart v. State, 258 So.2d 521 (Fla.App.1972), this court affirmed the order denying the first quest for post-conviction relief. Inasmuch as the ground for relief asserted herein has earlier been considered and rejected, we must on authority of Grant v. State, 224 So.2d 721 (Fla.App.2d 1969), affirm the order reviewed herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
290 So. 2d 84 (Smart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.