Smart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smart v. State

240 So. 2d 527

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 274 So. 2d 577 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 5, 1970·No. No. M-273·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Blackwelder v. State, 100 So.2d 834 (Fla.App.1958), and Johnson v. State, 222 So.2d 191 (Fla.1969).

CARROLL, DONALD K„ Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Blackwelder v. State, 100 So.2d 834 (Fla.App.1958), and Johnson v. State, 222 So.2d 191 (Fla.1969).

CARROLL, DONALD K„ Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.

Smart v. State, 240 So. 2d 527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

240 So. 2d 527 (Smart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related