Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products
This text of 133 F. App'x 895 (Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Smart appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his claims of wrongful employment termination and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products, No. CA-04-1341-13BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 F. App'x 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smart-v-spartanburg-steel-products-ca4-2005.