Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products

Fourth Circuit

Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products

133 F. App'x 895

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 14, 2005·No. No. 05-1327·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Smart appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his claims of wrongful employment termination and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products, No. CA-04-1341-13BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Smart appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his claims of wrongful employment termination and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products, No. CA-04-1341-13BI (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products, 133 F. App'x 895 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

133 F. App'x 895 (Smart v. Spartanburg Steel Products) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.