Smart v. Reynolds

333 F. App'x 702
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smart v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 114
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 7, 2009·No. No. 09-6839·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Dale Smart seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order denying Smart’s motion to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Smart seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Smart’s motions for default judgment and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smart v. Reynolds, 333 F. App'x 702 (4th Cir. 2009).

333 F. App'x 702 (Smart v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)