Smart v. Michigan Life Insurance

187 N.W.2d 241, 31 Mich. App. 189, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2071
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1971·No. Docket No. 9625·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs’ action below was for the recovery of accidental death benefits allegedly due plaintiffs as a result of the insured’s death on November 8,1967. A jury verdict was returned against the defendant in the sum of $5,000. Defendant appeals as of right from the denial of its motion for a new trial.

[190] The sole issue on appeal relates to the trial court’s instructional definition of the word “accident”. A review of the trial court’s instructions reveals that the instructional definition of “accident” was in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy and consistent with the accepted definition set forth in Guerdon Industries, Inc., v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York (1963), 371 Mich 12, 18, 19. See Brant v. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (1966), 4 Mich App 596.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smart v. Michigan Life Insurance, 187 N.W.2d 241, 31 Mich. App. 189, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2071 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

187 N.W.2d 241 (Smart v. Michigan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brant v. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance
145 N.W.2d 410 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1968)
Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
123 N.W.2d 143 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1963)