Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell

955 So. 2d 270, 6 La.App. 3 Cir. 1331, 2007 La. App. LEXIS 661, 2007 WL 983212

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 4, 2007

DocketNo. 06-1331

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 955 So. 2d 270 (Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, 955 So. 2d 270, 6 La.App. 3 Cir. 1331, 2007 La. App. LEXIS 661, 2007 WL 983212 (La. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gene Smart, et al. v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, et al., 06-1414 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07), 955 So.2d 263, 2007 WL 983222 the trial court’s judgment denying the exceptions of vagueness and improper cumulation of actions filed on behalf of J. Ogden Middleton is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment granting the exception of vagueness in compliance with La.Code Civ.P. art. 933(B) and to reserve consideration of the exception of improper cumulation of actions until the pleadings contain sufficient facts to assess the causes of action alleged. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the respondents, Gene Smart and Priscilla Babin.

WRIT GRANTED. DENIAL OF EXCEPTIONS OF VAGUENESS AND IMPROPER CUMULATION OF ACTIONS REVERSED. REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gene Smart, et al. v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, et al., 06-1414 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07), 955 So.2d 263, 2007 WL 983222 the trial court’s judgment denying the exceptions of vagueness and improper cumulation of actions filed on behalf of J. Ogden Middleton is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment granting the exception of vagueness in compliance with La.Code Civ.P. art. 933(B) and to reserve consideration of the exception of improper cumulation of actions until the pleadings contain sufficient facts to assess the causes of action alleged. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the respondents, Gene Smart and Priscilla Babin.

WRIT GRANTED. DENIAL OF EXCEPTIONS OF VAGUENESS AND IMPROPER CUMULATION OF ACTIONS REVERSED. REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

955 So. 2d 270, 6 La.App. 3 Cir. 1331, 2007 La. App. LEXIS 661, 2007 WL 983212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smart-v-gold-weems-bruser-sues-rundell-lactapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack