Smart v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa., (No. 2).
This text of 83 Pa. Super. 422 (Smart v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa., (No. 2).) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This case grows out of the same accident described in the opinion filed in Dessie Marie Smart v. Bell Telephone Co., No. 57, April Term, 1924 [the preceding case]. The judgment covers property damage to the plaintiff’s horse and buggy. The legal principles involved in the two cases are the same, and the same result necessarily follows.
The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Pa. Super. 422, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smart-v-bell-tel-co-of-pa-no-2-pasuperct-1924.