Smarr v. American Efird, Inc.
This text of Smarr v. American Efird, Inc. (Smarr v. American Efird, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2. The Travelers is the carrier on the risk.
3. An employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times.
4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $391.13, yielding a compensation rate of $260.75.
2. Stipulated Exhibit 2: Set of medical records submitted post-hearing.
3. Defendants' Exhibit 1: Medical record dated 4/10/00 from Dr. Bruce Wallace.
4. Defendants' Exhibit 2: Medical record dated 8/18/00 from Riverbend Chiropractic.
5. Defendants' Exhibit 3: Medical note dated August from CaroMont Family Medicine.
2. On March 20, 2000, the plaintiff was employed by defendant-employer American Efird, Inc. On this day, a forklift operator mistakenly backed into a yarn buggy, causing the buggy to strike and pin the plaintiff against a wall.
3. The plaintiff reported the incident to her supervisor and sought medical treatment for abdominal and low back pain. The plaintiff received physical therapy and chiropractic treatment.
4. On April 21, 2000, the plaintiff was released to return to regular duty work by Dr. Bruce Wallace at CaroMont Urgent Care.
5. On August 18, 2000, the plaintiff was released to return to work without restrictions by Dr. Snyder at Riverbend Chiropractic.
6. The plaintiff was released to return to work on September 7, 2000, by Dr. Larson at CaroMont Family Medicine.
7. The plaintiff offered no expert medical testimony to establish that she suffers from a disabling medical condition caused by the incident at work on March 20, 2000.
8. Based upon the medical and other evidence of record, the plaintiff has failed to establish that she is disabled as a result of the incident at work on March 20, 2000.
2. The plaintiff failed to establish that she is unable to earn the same wages she had earned before the injury, either in the same employment or other employment. Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution,
3. The plaintiff is entitled to payment of medical expenses incurred or to be incurred as a result of the compensable injury as may reasonably be required to effect a cure, provide relief, or lessen the period of disability. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
2. The defendants shall pay for medical expenses incurred or to be incurred as a result of the compensable injury as may reasonably be required to effect a cure, provide relief, or lessen the period of disability.
3. Each side shall bear its own costs.
This 30th day of January 2006.
S/ ________________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ _______________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
S/ _______________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smarr v. American Efird, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smarr-v-american-efird-inc-ncworkcompcom-2006.