Smallwood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Smallwood v. State

229 S.W. 515, 89 Tex. Crim. 63, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 23, 1921

DocketNo. 6157.

StatusPublished

This text of 229 S.W. 515 (Smallwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smallwood v. State, 229 S.W. 515, 89 Tex. Crim. 63, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355 (Tex. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case appellant was convicted in the County Court of Gregg County of a violation of our law regarding tick eradication, and his punishment fixed at á fine of $25.

The facts involved in this case are substantially similar to those of Walker v. State, this day decided by this court. The tick eradication law is attacked by appellant upon the same grounds discussed and disposed of in the opinion in said Walker case. Being in accord with the views expressed therein, and finding nothing in the record in this case calling for any further discussion of either the facts or the law, we omit same.

*64 Believing the law to be constitutional, and finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In this case appellant was convicted in the County Court of Gregg County of a violation of our law regarding tick eradication, and his punishment fixed at á fine of $25.

The facts involved in this case are substantially similar to those of Walker v. State, this day decided by this court. The tick eradication law is attacked by appellant upon the same grounds discussed and disposed of in the opinion in said Walker case. Being in accord with the views expressed therein, and finding nothing in the record in this case calling for any further discussion of either the facts or the law, we omit same.

*64 Believing the law to be constitutional, and finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 S.W. 515, 89 Tex. Crim. 63, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smallwood-v-state-texcrimapp-1921.