Smallwood v. State

1911 OK CR 370, 117 P. 652, 6 Okla. Crim. 615, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 336
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 5, 1911
DocketNo. A-775.
StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 370 (Smallwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smallwood v. State, 1911 OK CR 370, 117 P. 652, 6 Okla. Crim. 615, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 336 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the ' crime of forgery and was sentenced'to serve a term of six months .imprisonment in the state penitentiary. An appeal was taken by filing in this court on May 23rd, 1910, a pétition in error with ease-made. A motion to dismiss the appeal herein for the reason that a parole has been granted and that the conditions thereof were accepted ,and consented to by plaintiff in error has been filed. When a parole is granted and accepted and this fact is brought to the attention of this court pending the appeal the appeal will be dismissed. Gilmore v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 639, 108 Pac. 416. The motion to dismiss is sustained and said appeal is hereby dismissed and the canse remanded to the district court of Pittsburg county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilmore v. State
1910 OK CR 78 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK CR 370, 117 P. 652, 6 Okla. Crim. 615, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smallwood-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.