Smallwood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smallwood v. State

202 So. 3d 974, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16643

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 2016·No. No. 1D15-1834·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of challenges to his convictions and sentences for robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We find it unnecessary to reach the Confrontation Clause challenge that appellant raises regarding the admission of testimony by a DNA analyst because any error was harmless. We affirm his convictions without further comment. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with the direction set out in Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989, 991 (Fla.2016).

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises a number of challenges to his convictions and sentences for robbery with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We find it unnecessary to reach the Confrontation Clause challenge that appellant raises regarding the admission of testimony by a DNA analyst because any error was harmless. We affirm his convictions without further comment. However, we reverse and remand for resentencing consistent with the direction set out in Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989, 991 (Fla.2016).

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Smallwood v. State, 202 So. 3d 974, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16643 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

202 So. 3d 974 (Smallwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related