Smallwood v. Schwietering

66 N.Y. St. Rep. 875
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 6, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (Smallwood v. Schwietering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smallwood v. Schwietering, 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 875 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Freedman, J.

Upon the facts as they appeared upon the trial of the issues the plaintiff’s complaint was properly dismissed upon the grounds set forth by the learned trial judge, in the decision filed by him. Even if all others were open to some criticism, the last ground assigned, namely, that the contract upon which the plaintiffs rest their claim had been terminated before the trial, is quite conclusive. One who invokes equitable relief, and demands a prevent, ive remedy, becomes subject to the practice of courts of equity, where such relief only is administered as the nature of the case and the facts as they exist at the close of the litigation demand. Peck v. Goodberlett, 109 N. Y. 181. The record discloses no exception which calls for reversal. The complaint having been properly dismissed, no error was committed in denying plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief or the appointment of a receiver during their appeal. The judgment and order appealed from should be severally affirmed, with costs. On the appeal from the order, $10 costs and disbursements may be taxed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.Y. St. Rep. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smallwood-v-schwietering-nysuperctnyc-1895.