Smallwood v. Hall County

158 S.E.2d 443, 116 Ga. App. 720, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 937
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 21, 1967·No. 43173·Published

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The petition seeking damages from Hall County arising out of the alleged negligent operation of the county’s truck by a named driver, does not disclose, either expressly or by necessary implication, the existence of the agency of the driver, nor the connection of his act with the employment; therefore, the court did not err in its judgment sustaining the general demurrer. Code § 105-108; Lewis v. Amorous, 3 Ga. App. 50 (1) (59 SE 338). Neither does the petition show affirmatively that the action is authorized under the Constitution or statutes of this State. Decatur County v. Townsend, 46 Ga. App. 103 (1) (166 SE 774). And see Almon v. Terrell County, 89 Ga. App. 403 (79 SE2d 430). [721] It is not necessary to pass upon the question whether other reasons appear why the court was correct in sustaining the demurrer.

Argued November 6, 1967 Decided November 21, 1967. Howard B. Oliver, Jr., for appellant. Whelchel, Dunlap & Gignilliat, Weymon Forrester, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall and Eberhardt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smallwood v. Hall County, 158 S.E.2d 443, 116 Ga. App. 720, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 937 (Ga. Ct. App. 1967).

158 S.E.2d 443 (Smallwood v. Hall County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almon v. Terrell County
79 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Lewis v. Amorous
59 S.E. 338 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Decatur County v. Townsend
166 S.E. 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)