Smallwood v. Brown

Veterans Claims

Smallwood v. Brown

9 Vet. App. 108, 1996 WL 192855

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

DecidedApril 19, 1996

DocketNo. 94-609

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Vet. App. 108 (Smallwood v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smallwood v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 108, 1996 WL 192855 (Cal. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On January 31, 1996, the Court issued an order in this case for the Secretary to submit a supplemental memorandum addressing the following questions:

(1) Was VA’s October 1988 letter a denial of the cervical spine disability claim incorporating a notice regarding the submission of new and material evidence, or was it a second request for additional evidence in support of the cervical spine disability claim?

(2) What is the effect upon the Court’s jurisdiction of the November 9, 1988, statement identified by the appellant as an “NOD”?

[109]*109(8) What is the effect upon the Court’s jurisdiction of the December 14, 1988, statement identified by the appellant as an “NOD”?

On March 29, 1996, the Secretary filed a motion for leave to file a second supplemental record on appeal. On April 1, 1996, the Secretary filed a memorandum in response to the Court’s January 31,1996, order. Pursuant to the January 31, 1996, order the appellant, who is not represented by counsel, has until May 1, 1996, to file a response to the Secretary’s memorandum addressing the same questions. Upon further consideration of the April 1, 1996, pleading submitted by the Secretary and the factual background detailed in the Court’s January 31, 1996, order, the Court has determined the need for additional memoranda.

Accordingly it is

ORDERED that, the Secretary’s motion for leave to file a second supplemental record on appeal is granted, and the Clerk is directed to file the second supplemental record as of the date of this order. It is further

ORDERED that, any interested individual or entity may, within 30 days after the date of this order, submit a memorandum, as ami-cus curiae, on the issues stated above. It is further

ORDERED, sua sponte, that within 30 days after the date of this order the appellant may file a memorandum addressing the same issues stated above.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On January 31, 1996, the Court issued an order in this case for the Secretary to submit a supplemental memorandum addressing the following questions:

(1) Was VA’s October 1988 letter a denial of the cervical spine disability claim incorporating a notice regarding the submission of new and material evidence, or was it a second request for additional evidence in support of the cervical spine disability claim?

(2) What is the effect upon the Court’s jurisdiction of the November 9, 1988, statement identified by the appellant as an “NOD”?

[109]*109(8) What is the effect upon the Court’s jurisdiction of the December 14, 1988, statement identified by the appellant as an “NOD”?

On March 29, 1996, the Secretary filed a motion for leave to file a second supplemental record on appeal. On April 1, 1996, the Secretary filed a memorandum in response to the Court’s January 31,1996, order. Pursuant to the January 31, 1996, order the appellant, who is not represented by counsel, has until May 1, 1996, to file a response to the Secretary’s memorandum addressing the same questions. Upon further consideration of the April 1, 1996, pleading submitted by the Secretary and the factual background detailed in the Court’s January 31, 1996, order, the Court has determined the need for additional memoranda.

Accordingly it is

ORDERED that, the Secretary’s motion for leave to file a second supplemental record on appeal is granted, and the Clerk is directed to file the second supplemental record as of the date of this order. It is further

ORDERED that, any interested individual or entity may, within 30 days after the date of this order, submit a memorandum, as ami-cus curiae, on the issues stated above. It is further

ORDERED, sua sponte, that within 30 days after the date of this order the appellant may file a memorandum addressing the same issues stated above.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Vet. App. 108, 1996 WL 192855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smallwood-v-brown-cavc-1996.