Small v. Umatilla County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Small v. Umatilla County

939 P.2d 1190, 148 Or. App. 443, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 687

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 11, 1997

DocketCV950714; CA A91109

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 939 P.2d 1190 (Small v. Umatilla County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Small v. Umatilla County, 939 P.2d 1190, 148 Or. App. 443, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 687 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case concerns a summary judgment in favor of defendant Kerns on plaintiffs claims of trespass and interference with economic relations. We affirm on plaintiffs appeal without discussion.

Defendant Kerns cross-appeals, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of sanctions, including attorney fees, pursuant to ORCP 17 C. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for sanctions without making any factual findings on this issue. Both plaintiff and defendant agree that such findings are required. Polizos v. Skoro, 129 Or App 51, 55-56,877 P2d 662, rev den 320 Or 271 (1994); Plere Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Cities / ABC, Inc., 120 Or App 36, 38-39, 852 P2d 261, rev den 317 Or 583 (1993).

Affirmed on appeal; reversed and remanded for reconsideration of attorney fees on cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This case concerns a summary judgment in favor of defendant Kerns on plaintiffs claims of trespass and interference with economic relations. We affirm on plaintiffs appeal without discussion.

Defendant Kerns cross-appeals, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of sanctions, including attorney fees, pursuant to ORCP 17 C. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for sanctions without making any factual findings on this issue. Both plaintiff and defendant agree that such findings are required. Polizos v. Skoro, 129 Or App 51, 55-56,877 P2d 662, rev den 320 Or 271 (1994); Plere Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Cities / ABC, Inc., 120 Or App 36, 38-39, 852 P2d 261, rev den 317 Or 583 (1993).

Affirmed on appeal; reversed and remanded for reconsideration of attorney fees on cross-appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 P.2d 1190, 148 Or. App. 443, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-umatilla-county-orctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack