Small v. State
This text of Small v. State (Small v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Clarence Small, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appeal from Aiken County
Doyet A. Early,III, Circuit Court Judge
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Memorandum Opinion No. 2008-MO-021
Submitted April 1, 2008 Filed May 12, 2008
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Lance S. Boozer, of Columbia, for respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Suber v. State, 371 S.C. 554, 640 S.E.2d 884 (2007) (this Court will uphold findings of the PCR judge when there is any evidence of probative value to support them); Jackson v. State, 329 S.C. 345, 495 S.E.2d 768 (1998) (relief denied because no prejudice resulted from failure to call witnesses where no additional information would have been supplied).
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Small v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-state-sc-2008.