Small v. State

516 So. 2d 39, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2724, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 1987 WL 1951
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Small v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 535 So. 2d 622
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 1987·No. No. 87-1638·Published

Opinion

JORGENSON, Judge.

On a record replete with baseball metaphors similar to those favored in Johnson v. State, 501 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), the trial court neither followed the inquiry mandated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172 nor established a factual basis for the plea. We accordingly reverse the summary denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion, see State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla.1987)(reaffirming the mandatory nature of the inquiry required by Rule 3.172(c)), and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to permit the defendant to plead anew. The trial court would be well advised to remember that no matter if the league is major or minor the umpire too must follow the rules of the game.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Small v. State, 516 So. 2d 39, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2724, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11276, 1987 WL 1951 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

516 So. 2d 39 (Small v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
501 So. 2d 158 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Ginebra
511 So. 2d 960 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)