Small v. State

458 So. 2d 1136, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2015, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15022
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 1984·No. No. 83-2108·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for felony-murder, attempted robbery of a purse and armed robbery of an automobile. Recognizing that the double jeopardy clause prohibits multiple convictions and sentences for greater and lesser included offenses, see Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983), and that at least one of the underlying felonies must be deemed a necessarily lesser included offense of felony-murder, see Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 682, 97 S.Ct. 2912, 53 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1977); Scott v. State, 453 So.2d 798 (Fla.1984); Snowden v. State, 449 So.2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Jones v. State, 452 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), we vacate the defendant’s conviction and sentence for the less serious offense of attempted robbery. See Pinder v. State, 366 So.2d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), affd, 375 So.2d 836 (Fla.1979).

We have reviewed the other points on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences for felony-murder and armed robbery, but reverse the defendant’s conviction and sentence for attempted robbery.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

LETTS, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Small v. State, 458 So. 2d 1136, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2015, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 1136 (Small v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
868 A.2d 290 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)
State v. Wood
868 P.2d 70 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.
458 So. 2d 1136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)