Small v. State
This text of 929 A.2d 728 (Small v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 101 Conn. App. 213, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Does this court have jurisdiction to consider a petition for certification from the denial of relief on a motion for review? See State v. Curcio, 191 Conn. 27, 31, 463 A.2d 566 (1983).
“2. Is the Appellate Court’s ruling consistent with our decision in State v. Casiano, 282 Conn. 614, 922 A.2d 1065 (2007)?”
The trial court is hereby directed to appoint counsel for the petitioner for the limited purpose of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
929 A.2d 728, 283 Conn. 913, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-state-conn-2007.