Small v. Peacock

155 S.E. 754, 171 Ga. 475, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1930
DocketNo. 7804
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 754 (Small v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Small v. Peacock, 155 S.E. 754, 171 Ga. 475, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 481 (Ga. 1930).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

A petition must plainly and distinctly set forth a cause of action against a defendant. The petition in this case fails to set out any cause of action in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Small. It follows that the judge erred in overruling the demurrer filed by that defendant.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., and Gilbert, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilken Investments, LLC v. PLAMONDON, III
712 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
State Bar of Ga. v. Beazley
350 S.E.2d 422 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Douglas v. Langford
59 S.E.2d 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Walker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
26 S.E.2d 695 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.E. 754, 171 Ga. 475, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-peacock-ga-1930.