Small v. Levy

378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 28, 1979
DocketNo. 10525
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 So. 2d 201 (Small v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Small v. Levy, 378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343 (La. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s action on the rule to tax costs, see Bramlette v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968), and turn to a consideration of the frivolity of this appeal which has, as its sole basic issue, the validity of that trial court judgment.

Since LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164 must be narrowly construed and appeals favored (Guidry v. Carmouche, 320 So.2d 267 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), we must reject appellee’s contentions on this issue.

All costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Small v. Levy
381 So. 2d 1223 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-levy-lactapp-1979.