Small v. Levy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Small v. Levy

378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 28, 1979·No. No. 10525·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s action on the rule to tax costs, see Bramlette v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968), and turn to a consideration of the frivolity of this appeal which has, as its sole basic issue, the validity of that trial court judgment.

Since LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164 must be narrowly construed and appeals favored (Guidry v. Carmouche, 320 So.2d 267 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), we must reject appellee’s contentions on this issue.

All costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s action on the rule to tax costs, see Bramlette v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968), and turn to a consideration of the frivolity of this appeal which has, as its sole basic issue, the validity of that trial court judgment.

Since LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164 must be narrowly construed and appeals favored (Guidry v. Carmouche, 320 So.2d 267 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), we must reject appellee’s contentions on this issue.

All costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

AFFIRMED.

Small v. Levy, 378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343 (La. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

378 So. 2d 201 (Small v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related