Small v. Levy
This text of 378 So. 2d 201 (Small v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s action on the rule to tax costs, see Bramlette v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 361 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1968), and turn to a consideration of the frivolity of this appeal which has, as its sole basic issue, the validity of that trial court judgment.
Since LSA-C.C.P. art. 2164 must be narrowly construed and appeals favored (Guidry v. Carmouche, 320 So.2d 267 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975), we must reject appellee’s contentions on this issue.
All costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 So. 2d 201, 1979 La. App. LEXIS 3343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-levy-lactapp-1979.