Small v. Eby
This text of 9 Ind. 177 (Small v. Eby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case a judgment was rendered, execution issued, and a promissory note 'levied on and sold by virtue of the execution. The purchaser sues on that note. The defendant pleads that it was sold without appraisement, and, therefore, claims that the purchaser obtained no title.
It is no where shown in the record but that the contract upon which the judgment was rendered, on which the note was sold, was anterior in date to the passage of an appraisement law; or that it did not waive that law; and, in favor of the action of the Court, we presume one or the other. Woodruff v. Hoard, at this term
The judgment is affirmed with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Post, 186.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ind. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/small-v-eby-ind-1857.