Small v. Cromwell

1 Hill & Den. 154
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1843·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, Ch. J.

The failure to prove that an account of the personal estate and of the debts of the intestote had been presented to the surrogate at the time of the application for the order to show cause why a sale of the estate should not be made, was fatal to the jurisdiction of the officer, and of consequence to the authority of M. & M. Myers to convey to Ethridge. (15 Wend., 449; 19 id., 334; .1 Hill, 130.) And the suit was brought within time after the removal of the disability of infancy under which both the plaintiffs were laboring at the time the title accrued. (1 E. L., 1813, p 185, §2.)

New trial must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Small v. Cromwell, 1 Hill & Den. 154 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

1 Hill & Den. 154 (Small v. Cromwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford & Ford v. Walsworth
15 Wend. 449 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)