Smail v. Smail

387 A.2d 193, 175 Conn. 765
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 6, 1978·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court of the judicial district of Waterbury with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smail v. Smail, 387 A.2d 193, 175 Conn. 765 (Colo. 1978).

387 A.2d 193 (Smail v. Smail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.