Smail v. Smail
387 A.2d 193, 175 Conn. 765
This text of 387 A.2d 193 (Smail v. Smail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smail v. Smail, 387 A.2d 193, 175 Conn. 765 (Colo. 1978).
Opinion
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court of the judicial district of Waterbury with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
387 A.2d 193, 175 Conn. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smail-v-smail-conn-1978.