Smack v. Pattison

80 A.D.2d 874, 436 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10721
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Sheriff of Dutchess County, dated March 3, 1980, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and terminated his employment. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination that petitioner was repeatedly late or absent from work without appropriate excuse and that he failed to attend mandatory training sessions, is supported by substantial evidence. Furthermore, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). We have considered petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Rabin, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smack v. Pattison, 80 A.D.2d 874, 436 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

80 A.D.2d 874 (Smack v. Pattison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickinson v. New York State Unified Court System
99 A.D.3d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Palomino v. Bruno
157 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)