S.M. v. J.K.
315 F.3d 1058, 2003 WL 115202
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2001·No. Nos. 99-16184, 99-16960·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The Court sua sponte recalls the mandate issued on October 23, 2001.
The opinion filed August 27, 2001, is hereby amended by deleting the following sentence from footnote 7: “We decline to adopt the [United States v.] Scholl, [959 F.Supp. 1189 (D.Ariz.1997)] district court’s reasoning now, as it is contrary to Daubert’s [v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)] standard for admissibility.”
The Court directs the Clerk to reissue the mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
S.M. v. J.K., 315 F.3d 1058, 2003 WL 115202 (9th Cir. 2001).
315 F.3d 1058 (S.M. v. J.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dreith v. Nu Image, Inc.
648 F.3d 779 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Chavez v. Ciolino
310 F. App'x 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Gribben v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
528 F.3d 1166 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
A.W. v. I.B. Corp.
224 F.R.D. 20 (D. Maine, 2004)
S.M., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J.K., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
315 F.3d 1058 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)