S.M. v. J.K.

315 F.3d 1058, 2003 WL 115202
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2001
DocketNos. 99-16184, 99-16960
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 315 F.3d 1058 (S.M. v. J.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.M. v. J.K., 315 F.3d 1058, 2003 WL 115202 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The Court sua sponte recalls the mandate issued on October 23, 2001.

The opinion filed August 27, 2001, is hereby amended by deleting the following sentence from footnote 7: “We decline to adopt the [United States v.] Scholl, [959 F.Supp. 1189 (D.Ariz.1997)] district court’s reasoning now, as it is contrary to Daubert’s [v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)] standard for admissibility.”

The Court directs the Clerk to reissue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dreith v. Nu Image, Inc.
648 F.3d 779 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Chavez v. Ciolino
310 F. App'x 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Gribben v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
528 F.3d 1166 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
A.W. v. I.B. Corp.
224 F.R.D. 20 (D. Maine, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 F.3d 1058, 2003 WL 115202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sm-v-jk-ca9-2001.