S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services

62 So. 3d 1289, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2011·No. 2D11-2511·Published

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

S.M., the father, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking to vacate a nonfi-nal order entered after a status review hearing in a dependency proceeding. The order suspended his supervised visitation and contact with his children, M.M. and G.M. The Department of Children and Family Services concedes that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in suspending visitation without finding that visitation was not in the best interest of the children. Based on this concession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the order, and remand for further proceedings as we did recently in V.S. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 61 So.3d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). See also R.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 41 So.3d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Petition granted.

WHATLEY and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 62 So. 3d 1289, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

62 So. 3d 1289 (S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interest of A.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services
61 So. 3d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
RP v. Department of Children and Families
41 So. 3d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)