S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services

62 So. 3d 1289, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 24, 2011
Docket2D11-2511
StatusPublished

This text of 62 So. 3d 1289 (S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.M. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 62 So. 3d 1289, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge.

S.M., the father, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking to vacate a nonfi-nal order entered after a status review hearing in a dependency proceeding. The order suspended his supervised visitation and contact with his children, M.M. and G.M. The Department of Children and Family Services concedes that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in suspending visitation without finding that visitation was not in the best interest of the children. Based on this concession of error, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, vacate the order, and remand for further proceedings as we did recently in V.S. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 61 So.3d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). See also R.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 41 So.3d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Petition granted.

WHATLEY and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interest of A.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services
61 So. 3d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
RP v. Department of Children and Families
41 So. 3d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 So. 3d 1289, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sm-v-department-of-children-family-services-fladistctapp-2011.