Slutsky v. United Skates of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Slutsky v. United Skates of America

190 A.D.2d 847, 594 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 847 (Slutsky v. United Skates of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slutsky v. United Skates of America, 190 A.D.2d 847, 594 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated October 16, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and struck that portion of item number 7 of the plaintiffs’ bill of particulars which recites "and otherwise being reckless, careless and negligent”.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to grant the defendant’s motion (see, CPLR 2106; Matter of American Sec. Ins. Co. v Austin, 110 AD2d 697). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated October 16, 1990, which granted the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and struck that portion of item number 7 of the plaintiffs’ bill of particulars which recites "and otherwise being reckless, careless and negligent”.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to grant the defendant’s motion (see, CPLR 2106; Matter of American Sec. Ins. Co. v Austin, 110 AD2d 697). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 847, 594 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slutsky-v-united-skates-of-america-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack