Slupkowski v. Judge Advocate General Department of the United States Navy
This text of 329 F. App'x 908 (Slupkowski v. Judge Advocate General Department of the United States Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Stanley A. Slupkowski responds to the court’s order directing him to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Slupkowski also moves for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and submits various documents requesting mandamus relief.
In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Slupkowski filed a notice of appeal which appears to involve a district court order denying Slupkowski leave to file a document involving a request for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and asserting a “civil complaint.” Because Slupkowski stated that he sought review by this court, the district court transmitted the notice of appeal to this court.
Slupkowski has not shown that this court has jurisdiction over his appeal. He has not shown that the appeal falls within this court’s jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1), (2). Additionally, Slupkowski has not shown that his requests for mandamus relief are within the jurisdiction of this court.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) This appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(8) Slupkowski’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
(4) Slupkowski’s requests for mandamus relief are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slupkowski-v-judge-advocate-general-department-of-the-united-states-navy-cafc-2008.