Slupkowski v. Eternick
This text of Slupkowski v. Eternick (Slupkowski v. Eternick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7409
STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RANDY ETERNICK, Associate Warden for Medical Services at FMC - Butner,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-214-5-BO)
Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley A. Slupkowski, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Stanley A. Slupkowski appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Slupkowski v. Eternick, No. CA-05-214-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
May 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Slupkowski v. Eternick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slupkowski-v-eternick-ca4-2006.