Slupkowski v. Eternick

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2006
Docket05-7409
StatusUnpublished

This text of Slupkowski v. Eternick (Slupkowski v. Eternick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slupkowski v. Eternick, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7409

STANLEY A. SLUPKOWSKI,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RANDY ETERNICK, Associate Warden for Medical Services at FMC - Butner,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-05-214-5-BO)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley A. Slupkowski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stanley A. Slupkowski appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Slupkowski v. Eternick, No. CA-05-214-5-BO (E.D.N.C.

May 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Slupkowski v. Eternick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slupkowski-v-eternick-ca4-2006.