Sluder v. . Rogers

64 N.C. 289

• Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
• Decided: January 5, 1870
• Status: Published

Opinion

Beade, J.

It has been decided that the Homestead exemption is applicable to debts existing before the adoption of the constitution, debts not being a lien upon the debtor’s property: Hill v. Kessler, 63 N. C., 437.

At this term it has been decided that the exemption is not applicable when the land had been levied on before the. adoption oí the constitution, the levy creating a lien &c. McKethan v. Terry, ante. In an application to me at Chambers a few days ago, in the case of Harshaw v. Henderson, in Bowan Superior Court, for an injunction to restrain a trustee from selling land to pay debts under a deed executed before the adoption of the constitution, I decided against the application, upon the ground that the conveyance was a lien to the amount of the debts secured, and that the Homestead exemption did not apply. In this I had the concurrence of my associate Justices of this Court, whom I consulted.

These cases seem to be decisive of the case before us. Upon the death of the father before the adoption of the Constitution, his lands descended to his children, his heirs, cum onere, — charged with the father’s debts, to the extent of such debts after the personal property was exhausted. They had no power to sell it, and it was assets, which might be applied by the administrator: Bev. Code.

These heirs, minor children, are not entitled to a Homestead in the land descended to them from their father, as against their father’s debts. They would be as againstjtheir own debts. So they would be as against their father’s debts, if he had died after the adoption of the Constitution.

This will be certified.

Peb Oubiam. Judgment reversed.