Sluczinskas v. Pullen

87 A. 1117, 87 Conn. 702, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 148
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 13, 1913
StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 1117 (Sluczinskas v. Pullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sluczinskas v. Pullen, 87 A. 1117, 87 Conn. 702, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 148 (Colo. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the verdict of the jury • was warranted by-the evidence.' The court, therefore, properly refused to set it aside. The complaint against the charge is that it fails to instruct the jury as to the defendant’s duty to pass the plaintiff upon his right, and fails to fully charge them concerning his “right to pass and to refrain from passing under the circumstances.” No requests for such instructions appear to have been made before the charge, and there was no evidence in the case calling for further or different instructions in these respects than were given.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A. 1117, 87 Conn. 702, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sluczinskas-v-pullen-conn-1913.