Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman

68 Ga. App. 33
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 24, 1942
Docket29578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 Ga. App. 33 (Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman, 68 Ga. App. 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Sutton, J.

There being no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions on any final judgment of the court in this case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it, and the writ of error is hereby dismissed. Blackwell v. State, 46 Ga. App. 830 (169 S. E. 507); Moyers v. State, 59 Ga. App. 875 (2 S. E. 2d, 517) ; Hicks v. Community Loan &c. Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226); Empire Cotton-Oil Co. v. Taylor, 152 Ga. 693 (111 S. E. 35); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 (184 S. E. 319); Jordan v. Harber, 182 Ga. 621 (186 S. E. 670); Davis v. State, 191 Ga. 558 (13 S. E. 2d, 351).

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Felton, J., concur. Hugh B. Kimbrough, for plaintiffs in error. J. D. Kirkland, J. Paul Dekle, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia Well & Supply Co. v. Landers
108 S.E.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Ga. App. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slotin-co-v-eiseman-gactapp-1942.