Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman

68 Ga. App. 33
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 24, 1942·No. 29578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sutton, J.

There being no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions on any final judgment of the court in this case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it, and the writ of error is hereby dismissed. Blackwell v. State, 46 Ga. App. 830 (169 S. E. 507); Moyers v. State, 59 Ga. App. 875 (2 S. E. 2d, 517) ; Hicks v. Community Loan &c. Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226); Empire Cotton-Oil Co. v. Taylor, 152 Ga. 693 (111 S. E. 35); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 (184 S. E. 319); Jordan v. Harber, 182 Ga. 621 (186 S. E. 670); Davis v. State, 191 Ga. 558 (13 S. E. 2d, 351).

Writ of error dismissed.

Stephens, P. J., and Felton, J., concur. Hugh B. Kimbrough, for plaintiffs in error. J. D. Kirkland, J. Paul Dekle, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman, 68 Ga. App. 33 (Ga. Ct. App. 1942).

68 Ga. App. 33 (Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virginia Well & Supply Co. v. Landers
108 S.E.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)