Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman
This text of 68 Ga. App. 33 (Slotin & Co. v. Eiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no assignment of error in the bill of exceptions on any final judgment of the court in this case, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it, and the writ of error is hereby dismissed. Blackwell v. State, 46 Ga. App. 830 (169 S. E. 507); Moyers v. State, 59 Ga. App. 875 (2 S. E. 2d, 517) ; Hicks v. Community Loan &c. Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226); Empire Cotton-Oil Co. v. Taylor, 152 Ga. 693 (111 S. E. 35); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 (184 S. E. 319); Jordan v. Harber, 182 Ga. 621 (186 S. E. 670); Davis v. State, 191 Ga. 558 (13 S. E. 2d, 351).
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 Ga. App. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slotin-co-v-eiseman-gactapp-1942.