Sloteman v. Mack

21 N.W. 527, 61 Wis. 575, 1884 Wisc. LEXIS 259
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 N.W. 527 (Sloteman v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloteman v. Mack, 21 N.W. 527, 61 Wis. 575, 1884 Wisc. LEXIS 259 (Wis. 1884).

Opinion

LyoN, J.

This is an appeal from an order striking out certain portions of appellant’s answer. The action is upon a contract for putting a steam-heating and ventilating apparatus in the building of the appellant, one of the defendants. The answer consists of matter pleaded as a defense to the action, and two counterclaims. The portions stricken'out are in the defensive portion of the answer. It is unnecessary to make any more specific statement of the pleadings,” or to determine whether the matter stricken out should have been retained. If it was error to strike out those portions, it is one which does not harm the appellant or affect any substantial right. Under the answer, as it now stands, the appellant may introduce any evidence that he could have introduced under the original answer. Hence the error (if error it be) does not work a reversal of the order. R. S. sec. 2829.

By the Court.— The order of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prindle v. Haight
52 N.W. 1134 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1892)
Brachman v. Kuehnmuench
24 N.W. 902 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.W. 527, 61 Wis. 575, 1884 Wisc. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloteman-v-mack-wis-1884.