Slote v. Berman

32 A.D.2d 759, 301 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3750

This text of 32 A.D.2d 759 (Slote v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slote v. Berman, 32 A.D.2d 759, 301 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Although we conclude that the landlord believed .that the accommodations, were decontrolled and in good faith sought a determination of decontrol, we conclude that the accommodations, although decontrolled by the 1947 Federal Housing and Rent Act (61 U. S. Stat. 198; § 204, subd. [b]) as premises subjected to a valid written lease, were recontrolled by the Federal 1949 amendatory act (63 U. S. Stat. 22; § 204, subd. [b], par. [3]). Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 759, 301 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slote-v-berman-nyappdiv-1969.