Slot v. State
315 So. 2d 207, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13554
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction, entered pursuant to a plea of guilty, for possession of marijuana less than five grams and eleven-month sentence thereon. The sole ground for reversal is that the trial court erred in accepting appellant’s plea of guilty without first determining that there was an underlying factual basis for the plea. We affirm for the same reasons as those set forth in Estes v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 294 So.2d 122, aff’d. Fla.1975, 316 So.2d 276.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Slot v. State, 315 So. 2d 207, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
315 So. 2d 207 (Slot v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clinton v. State
30 Fla. Supp. 2d 143 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1987)