Slosson v. B., C. R. & N. R. Co.
This text of 1 N.W. 543 (Slosson v. B., C. R. & N. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
II. The court gave an instruction in these words: "If the plaintiff failed to plow around his stacks such failure would not constitute negligence unless cautious and prudent farmers generally plow around their stacks under like circumstances. ” The giving of this instruction is assigned as error. It is insisted that there is no evidence upon which it could be based. Whether the measure of care which the plaintiff should have exercised can be determined by the custom of others we need not consider. Such question is not presented. If it could be so determined there should be some evidence of custom, and we find none in this case.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.W. 543, 51 Iowa 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slosson-v-b-c-r-n-r-co-iowa-1879.