Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Slosser v. Bouchlas

Slosser v. Bouchlas

540 So. 2d 169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 676, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1320, 1989 WL 22534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2743
StatusPublished

This text of 540 So. 2d 169 (Slosser v. Bouchlas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slosser v. Bouchlas, 540 So. 2d 169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 676, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1320, 1989 WL 22534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. Unlike the trial court, we are unable to identify any allegations of the complaint that allege the commission of a tort against the plaintiff in the state of [170]*170Florida sufficient to permit jurisdiction to be obtained over appellants, all nonresidents. Cf. Carida v. Holy Cross Hospital, Inc., 424 So.2d 849 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). The appellee states in his brief on appeal that the appellants did various things in Florida, such as “initiated interstate communications via Consumer Affairs Agency in Palm Beach County,” but those allegations do not appear in the complaint.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carida v. Holy Cross Hosp., Inc.
424 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 So. 2d 169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 676, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1320, 1989 WL 22534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slosser-v-bouchlas-fladistctapp-1989.