Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Bearden

74 So. 230, 199 Ala. 132, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 21, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 74 So. 230 (Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Bearden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Bearden, 74 So. 230, 199 Ala. 132, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 285 (Ala. 1916).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

— While this court held in Cole v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 186 Ala. 192, 65 South. 177, Ann. Cas. 1916E,

[133]*13399, that section 1035 of the Code of 1907 applied to ore as well as coal mines, we think that, regardless of the technical definition of the word ‘mine,” it was the legislative purpose to protect employees in underground mines, whether coal or ore, and not in’ open or surface mines such as the one here involved. The trial court erroneously applied said statute to the mine in question, and therein committed reversible error. The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Anderson, C. J., and McClellan, Mayfield, and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McCully
310 So. 2d 833 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)
Carter Oil Co. v. Blair
57 So. 2d 64 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Blankenship v. W. E. Cox & Sons
162 S.W.2d 918 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1942)
Atlas Milling Co. v. Jones
115 F.2d 61 (Tenth Circuit, 1940)
Sheffield Iron Corporation v. Dennis
86 So. 467 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Bearden
80 So. 42 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 So. 230, 199 Ala. 132, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloss-sheffield-s-i-co-v-bearden-ala-1916.