Slonim v. Sterling Information Services, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Slonim v. Sterling Information Services, Ltd.

37 A.D.2d 530, 322 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 530 (Slonim v. Sterling Information Services, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Slonim v. Sterling Information Services, Ltd., 37 A.D.2d 530, 322 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 26, 1971, dismissing plaintiff’s second and third causes of action for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the third cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Although inartistically pleaded, plaintiff has adequately alleged the requisite misrepresentation and scienter necessary to a cause of action in fraud. Defendants have been alerted to the basis of the plaintiff’s claim and further specificity is obtainable by means of appropriate pretrial procedures and a bill of particulars. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 26, 1971, dismissing plaintiff’s second and third causes of action for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the third cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Although inartistically pleaded, plaintiff has adequately alleged the requisite misrepresentation and scienter necessary to a cause of action in fraud. Defendants have been alerted to the basis of the plaintiff’s claim and further specificity is obtainable by means of appropriate pretrial procedures and a bill of particulars. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 530, 322 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slonim-v-sterling-information-services-ltd-nyappdiv-1971.